Performance
Performance has been measured on an usual test platform which contains Intel Core i7 5820K processor and ASUS Rampage V Extreme motherboard with the latest BIOS version.
AIDA64 Memory and Cache Benchmark
Memory bandwidth in AIDA64 is really good to the point I had to check it couple of times as it was even higher than some DDR4-2666 memory kits could make. Looks like Kingston team once again focused on improving memory profiles. Similar situation we could see in previous Kingston memory kit reviews. Sometimes sub timings and additional settings make memory faster than what you could expect looking at the memory label.
MaxxMem Preview
We haven’t seen MaxxMem benchmark for a while so I decided to add it so we can see how all memory kits compare in single threaded tests.
HyperX FURY also here is showing high performance even though memory clock isn’t high. Results are similar to these of DDR4-2666 kits so simply great for DDR4-2400 kit.
HyperPi 32M
HyperPi 32M is one more test where HyperX FURY is showing its high performance. Once again results are similar or even better than DDR4-2666 kits what is unusual considering lower memory clock. All overclockers and computer enthusiasts should be satisfied with these results as there is still some headroom for overclocking and additional tweaking.
Cinebench R15
The same story is repeating in Cinebench R15. The latest version of rendering benchmark is maybe not best to compare memory kits but is reacting on memory speed. HyperX FURY is somewhere in the middle of DDR4-2666 kits so of course it’s a good result.
PCMark8
PCMark8 is the only benchmark where we can see slightly higher results on higher clocked memory kits. HyperX FURY DDR4-2400 is slower than the DDR4-2666 kits but not so much and it wouldn’t really matter in a daily work.
HyperX FURY 32GB DDR4-2400 memory kit is faster than I was expecting. Our review kit is showing that memory at lower frequency doesn’t have to be slow. At the same time can save some money.
