我有点饱受所有这些所谓的“泄漏”的Ryzen基准……所有这些数字并不意味着现实生活中。我想看到真正的ryzen cpus和真正的主动员,它们支持这些芯片……在肉体中!
许多网站已经报告了一些泄漏(如Futuremark的数据库所捕获的)在AMD即将到来的CPU上得分。现在,一些基准似乎不仅浮出水面,不仅是该公司的8核,16条线程怪物,而且还涉及其Sweet Spot 6核,12杆式CPU及其更为平凡的4核产品。
Taking into account some metrics (which you should, naturally, take with some grains of salt), and comparing Intel’s and AMD’s Ryzen offerings on 3DMark’s Fire Strike Physics scores, we can see that a $389 Ryzen 7 1700X (8 cores, 16 threads) at its base clock of 3.4 GHz manages to surpass Intel’s competing (in thread count alone, since it retails for $1089) 6900K running at its base 3.2 GHz frequency – with the Ryzen processor scoring 17,878 points versus the 6900K’s 17,100. Doing some fast and hard maths, this would mean that if the R7 1700X was to be clocked at the same speed as the 6900K, it would still be faster, clock for clock (though not by much, admittedly). We don’t know whether Turbo was disabled or not on these tests, for either AMD’s or Intel’s processor, so we have to consider that. However, if Turbo were enabled, that would mean that the R7 1700X’s clockspeed would only be 100 MHz higher than the 6900K’s (3.8 GHz max, vs 3.7 GHz max on the Intel CPU).
当将AMD的六核,259 $ 259 R5 1600X与英特尔的617 6850k与Intel的$ 617 6850K进行比较时,我们看到了相同的情况,尽管Ryzen样本的分数几乎相同,尽管以300 MHz的基本时钟运行(3.3 GHz对Intel的3.6 GHz)。
资源:TechPowerup